Supreme Court says authorities can take DNA swabs

Although the consensus was far from unanimous, the Supreme Court ruled recently that law enforcement officials can take DNA swabs from those who are taken into custody for a serious criminal offense, regardless of whether or not they have been convicted. An article that was published in USA Today sheds light on the issue and the opinions of some of the Supreme Court members who voted.

Justice Samuel Alito believes that the 2013 case, which was settled by a 5-4 vote, was more important than any other criminal procedure case that had been before the court in decades. While Justice Alito is a strong supporter of officers taking DNA swabs, other Supreme Court Justices had reservations. Justice Antonin Scalia believes this procedure represents unreasonable search, while Justice Sonya Sotomayor is concerned about the possibility of this practice finding its way into workplaces and schools throughout the country.

Unrelated arrest stems rape charge and conviction

The case was brought before the Supreme Court after a man in Maryland was charged with rape based on a DNA swab. The DNA was collected when the man was arrested for a non-related charge. He was convicted of the charge, but on appeal, a Maryland court ruled the state did not have the right to take his DNA. The state then appealed the decision to the Supreme Court. The high court agreed with the state, reversed the ruling and the rape conviction was reinstated.

While the court has made it clear that they do not find DNA collection a violation of a person’s constitutional rights, many still voice concern with this practice, such as:

  • The placing of the DNA into a national registry
  • The DNA used to solve other crimes
  • Overload of the DNA database
  • Personal privacy issues 

Supporters believe that officers should take DNA swabs from people who have been apprehended for a felony or other serious offense. They argue it is similar to taking fingerprints and pictures of suspected offenders.

Potential consequences

More than half of the states in this country already have laws in place that permit the collection of DNA. Although the practice is not currently permitted in Minnesota, this could change as a result of the U.S. Supreme Court ruling.

Because authorities use this DNA to assist in the investigation of other crimes, opponents are worried about the possibility of wrongful convictions and false positives. Not only can DNA be misinterpreted or contaminated, but fraudulent activity and the switching of samples could occur. When someone is arrested for a criminal offense, it is a good idea for them to meet with an attorney as soon as possible to protect their rights.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Digital Evidence in Sex Crime Cases: How Your Online Activity Can Be Used Against You in Minnesota

Prosecutors in Minnesota use digital evidence in sex crime cases to connect suspects to crimes. They analyze the chronological order of online events and statements to show intent, motive, or premeditation. The common types of evidence used in sex crime investigations include direct, actual, and circumstantial evidence.

Can You Be Charged With a DUI If You’re Sleeping in Your Car in Minnesota?

One of the questions DUI lawyers in the state often answer is: Can you be charged with a DUI if you’re sleeping in your car? You can face DUI charges in Minnesota even if you are not actively operating your car. The “physical control” law states that anyone with the capacity to drive a vehicle while intoxicated can get arrested and charged with DUI.

How Prosecutors Use Text Messages in Minnesota Drug Cases

Prosecutors use text messages in Minnesota drug cases to prove circumstantial evidence. Text messages can prove intent or motive to distribute drugs. Knowing how your text messages may be used against you in a drug crime case can help you plan an effective defense strategy. That’s why you should involve a Minnesota drug crime attorney immediately after you get arrested, charged, or discover the police are investigating you for a drug crime. Your lawyer can carefully examine your text messages and determine the best way to counter the prosecution’s case.