Teenage Drinking & Driving Rates are Declining

Responding to these statistics, Minneapolis DWI lawyer Max Keller remarked, “No one factor is responsible for the decline. Educational campaigns, increased sobriety checkpoints, and tougher penalties for underage drinking and driving have all helped. Coupled with social pressures, parental involvement, and the stigma associated with a DWI conviction, more and more teens are simply not drinking and driving.”

While the decrease in teenage drinking and driving rates is something to celebrate, it’s a victory that should be tempered. That’s because the CDC’s records over this period showed that nearly 25% of teenage driving fatalities remain alcohol related. Of these, 17% of teenage drivers between the ages of 16 and 20 who died in alcohol related accidents had Blood Alcohol Concentrations that were .8% or greater. This meant their ability to safely operate a motor vehicle was severely limited. Moreover, in their diminished capacity these drivers and their passengers neglected seatbelt usage. According to the CDC, 71% of teenage drivers killed in alcohol related accidents in 2012 were not wearing their seat belts.

“The CDC conducted a survey in 2013 that indicated 22% of teenagers reported having ridden in a vehicle with a driver who had been drinking. To counter this, the CDC recommends stronger enforcement of Zero BAC laws for drivers under 21 years of age. It also supports enhanced education and public awareness efforts. These efforts are showing their effectiveness. However, it’s clear that there is still a long road ahead,” stated Minneapolis DWI lawyer Max A. Keller.

In Minnesota, teenagers convicted of DWI (.08 or greater) can be fined $3000 and sentenced to up to one year in jail. Moreover, a first time conviction (.08 or lower) can result in the loss of driving privileges for 30 days. A second conviction can result in revocation of a license for 6 months. This information will remain on a driver’s record for 15 years.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.