How unique is your hair? The FBI is looking into it

For decades the FBI has been using hair analysis and other forms of DNA testing to aid in the conviction of defendants.

The science has certainly helped defendants who are accused of violent crimes, murder and rape to clear their name, too, but the FBI has recently announced that it will be looking into some of its cases to check for faulty science. One of the biggest problems the FBI has had, it seems, is agents making claims about hair analysis that can’t be supported by science. When those statements led to a conviction, it is very possible that the wrong person was convicted.

The review will start with cases in which the defendants were sentenced to death row, meaning Minnesota cases won’t be reviewed for a while. When they are, however, there may be good news for Minnesotans who are locked up for serious sex crimes they never committed.

Unfortunately, juries are easily persuaded by DNA evidence. When someone gets up and says that hair found at the crime scene matches the defendant’s or that hair is so unique that it could not possibly belong to anyone else, the jury is likely to take that testimony at face value. Unfortunately, if police or scientists are stretching the truth, this could have disastrous effects.

Fortunately, the FBI has announced that it will be reviewing a large number of cases. Moreover, it has said that it will waive any statute of limitations arguments or federal rules that would otherwise prohibit an appeal.

Although this will not initially affect Minnesota, many individuals in Minnesota’s prisons will eventually have their convictions reviewed after years in prison.

Source: The Washington Post, “U.S. reviewing 27 death penalty convictions for FBI forensic testimony errors,” Spence S. Hsu, July 17, 2013

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Can Past Allegations of Sex Crimes Be Used Against You in Minnesota?

One question people charged with a sex crime in Minneapolis, MN, ask is: Can past allegations of sex crimes be used against me? Under Minnesota Rules of Evidence, past sex crime allegations aren't admissible as evidence in court to prove a suspect's character and argue that it contributed to the commission of the current crime. However, there are circumstances in which the court may allow prior allegations or bad conduct as evidence. These circumstances include when the prosecution can demonstrate that prior allegations or acts are key to establishing intent, identity, or pattern of bad conduct related to the current crime.