USA Swimming defends itself against allegations of sexual cover-up

Residents of Wayzata were likely watching Olympic swimming this summer as Michael Phelps, Ryan Lochte and other members of the American swim team took to the pool. These members of USA Swimming were just a few of the thousands of athletes who work tirelessly under the direction of their coaches. Now, people in Wayzata may have heard that USA Swimming and prominent coaches are defending themselves about sexual misconduct.

It does not appear that any criminal charges have yet been filed in the alleged incident, but it is possible that all of this attention may force prosecutors to treat the situation as a criminal complaint. A swimming coach that had been previously fired by the former national coach is alleging that the national coach knew of sexual misconduct within the organization and that he and USA Swimming had an agreement to cover up the scandal.

It appears that the coach who was fired was actively trying to keep children away from a coach that she believed had been accused of sexual abuse and had made it quite clear that she did not want him working in the swim club. She took these actions despite the fact that USA Swimming had not completed an investigation into the sexual abuse claims.

The fired coach has subsequently filed a wrongful termination lawsuit against the former national coach and is being represented by the same attorney that previously represented a woman who sued yet another coach for sexual misconduct. This connection has raised some eyebrows, calling into question the veracity of the terminated coach’s allegations.

As this situation unfolds, careers and reputations may be ruined by an allegation of sexual misconduct.

Source: CBS News, “USA Swimming: No deal with ex-coach Mark Schubert to cover up claims of sexual misconduct,” Sept. 19, 2012

For an organization or an individual in Minnesota to be charged with or associated with sexual assault can be extremely taxing. Stop by our website to see what we have done for people accused of sexual assault.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

A Santa Clara University study shows that over one million people in Minnesota have criminal records. In Minneapolis alone, 5,713 crimes are reported annually within an area of 100,000 residents. These criminal cases require the defendants to present evidence challenging the prosecutor's narrative. So, when does the defense present evidence in a criminal case? Your defense team presents evidence at the trial phase right after the prosecution team completes outlining the facts it intends to prove and how its evidence will prove you guilty.
Media attention and public scrutiny after conviction can hurt your personal and professional reputation, especially if your criminal case is high-profile. One of the questions you may ask is: How do I handle media attention and public scrutiny after conviction in Minnesota? You can do that by familiarizing yourself with your rights, having a witness present during a media interview, minimizing media consumption, and taking a break from social media. Building a strong support system and working closely with a criminal defense lawyer can help you handle or minimize the impact of public scrutiny.
The timeline for filing pre-trial motions in a criminal case in Minnesota varies with the type of motion. A motion related to the discovery of evidence or dismissal of a criminal case must be filed at least three days before the Omnibus Hearing. The prosecution is then allowed to respond to the motions, and the court sets the timeline for these responses.