Woodbury man accused of felony DWI after cop sees car doing doughnuts

A 21-year-old Woodbury, Minnesota man is facing felony drunk driving charges after he was pulled over shortly after 2:00 in the morning on March 16. Woodbury Police claim that an officer watched a car leave from the area near a saloon and cross into a parking lot outside a fitness center in Woodbury. The officer claims that the driver of the car did some “doughnuts” in the fitness center’s parking lot.

Law enforcement says that the car left the parking area and the driver failed to use a turn signal while turning onto Radio Drive. Police conducted a traffic stop and claim that a 21-year-old Woodbury man was behind the wheel. Police say that the driver has three previous driving while impaired convictions–one entered in 2009 and two recorded in 2011.

Police apparently expanded the traffic stop to investigate for an alleged DWI offense. Ultimately, police assert that the driver blew 0.17 percent in an evidentiary DWI breath test.

Minnesota law provides harsh criminal and civil consequences for drivers accused of repeat DWI offense. The law has various parts, which are referred to as aggravating factors that can be used to enhance a new DWI charge based upon prior qualified alcohol related incidents. A prior DWI license revocation or prior DWI conviction within ten years of a current charge can enhance the new charge to a higher level of offense.

Authorities say that the Woodbury man has three prior convictions of DWI within that ten-year time-frame and have charged the man with felony DWI. A conviction of the charge could bring a maximum sentence of seven years in prison. In addition, administrative penalties may be imposed after a DWI arrest, including a license revocation and, in some cases, vehicle forfeiture.

The administrative issues are handled separately from the criminal case, and a person facing the civil penalties must affirmatively act in order to raise a challenge. The time frame to raise a challenge is a matter of weeks and if not properly raised before time runs out, the challenge is generally lost, even if a conviction is not entered in the criminal case.

Source: Woodbury Patch, “Three-Time DWI Offender Busted After Doing Doughnuts in Woodbury Parking Lot,” Kris Janisch, March 25, 2013

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Stay calm and compose after getting accused of a crime but not charged in Minneapolis, MN. Do not discuss the facts of your case with anyone, including your relatives and family members. Hire a criminal defense attorney with a demonstrated record of winning cases like yours. Your attorney will discuss your rights, guide you on how to cooperate with law enforcement within the legal boundaries, and build a solid defense strategy to fight the charges you could face in the future.
Expungement and sealing of records in Minnesota affect how your criminal history appears to government agencies and the public. The main difference between the two legal actions is that expungement permanently removes past arrests, criminal charges, or convictions from private and public databases, while sealing hides the criminal record from the public. Courts, government entities, and law enforcement agencies can access sealed criminal records.
Minnesota recently passed a public safety bill that brings sweeping changes to the state’s juvenile justice system. While minors sometimes run afoul of the law, the juvenile justice system seeks to account for the differences between children and adults. Therefore, while the penalties for adults convicted of crimes focus on punishment, those for juveniles are aimed at diversion and restorative practices.