9 Months of Potentially Flawed Blood Alcohol Tests

The manufacturer of blood alcohol testing kits used by Minnesota law enforcement has issued a large recall based on suspicions of flawed tests over a nine-month period.

Table of Contents

How Accurate Are Blood Alcohol Tests?

Recently, up to nine months of potentially flawed blood tests collected by Minnesota law enforcement have been recalled. The recall affects all Minnesota blood alcohol testing kits used between August 20, 2018, and the present.

A worldwide medical supplier, Becton, Dickinson, and Company (known as “BD”), supplies the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension with blood alcohol testing kits. They recently sent out a notice warning of potentially flawed results in thousands of blood alcohol tests due to an error omitting a necessary preservative in test vials. This important missing preservative is a key factor in determining accurate blood alcohol content (BAC) levels in DUI testing because it prevents alcohol fermentation. Once fermentation occurs, the blood alcohol test is considered flawed and rendered inadmissible in court.  

The recall notice emphasized that once blood is collected in the vials, lab clinicians are not able to determine if vials contained the necessary preservative. As a result, there is no scientifically accurate way to determine an accurate BAC in test subjects. In some cases, BAC tests processed without the preservative have yielded reliable results, but only when test vials are stored at room temperature for no longer than two days.

According to Minnesota DUI attorneys, many innocent people are wrongfully arrested due to faulty field sobriety tests. Minnesota drivers stopped on suspicion of drunk driving will likely be asked by police officers to complete standardized field sobriety tests that include a walk and turn test, a one-leg stand test, and a horizontal gaze test. By law, these three tests are voluntary, however, a breathalyzer test is mandatory. In most cases, blood alcohol testing is done at the police station. However, Minnesota police officers are not required by law to have a warrant to perform a non-consensual blood test if they believe there is probable cause in a drunk driving accident, or a driver is involved in a criminal vehicular homicide incident.

In Minnesota and most other states, blood alcohol testing is common in DUI accidents, however, the accuracy of the test relies on the lab that processes the test results. When blood tests are flawed, it can mean the difference between freedom and prison for a driver who is wrongly convicted.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.