Minneapolitans need to rethink the stranger with candy mentality

Although parents in Minneapolis have grown up with stories and urban legends of strangers lurking with candy, waiting to abduct children and do horrible things, the reality is that very few children are harmed by strangers.

When we look at the numbers, nearly all incidents of child molestation are committed by family members or acquaintances, with only 7 percent being committed by strangers. So, if the “creepy man in the van” is a myth, why are we still so worried about him?

Perhaps it is the national response to individuals on the sex offender registry. There are communities across the country that are taking a hard-line stance against former offenders, especially around Halloween. From preventing them from decorating to making it painfully clear that they are not giving out candy, communities continue to buy into the fear of “stranger danger.”

Although it makes sense to want to protect our children against those who would do them harm, towns can take it too far. If we look at the facts, we can see that individuals on the registry are much less likely to reoffend. On top of that, they are already on a sex offender registry. If parents are still concerned, much of these former offenders’ data is available online. Parents can always just steer clear of offenders’ homes without forcing ex-offenders to remind community members of what they’ve done.

The people on the registry have made mistakes, and they’ve paid a price for them. They have spent time in jail or prison, and they continue to remain on the registry. Why must we insist on pushing them to identify themselves during Halloween, too?

Source: The Huffington Post, “Manufacturing Fear: Halloween Laws for Sex Offenders,” Emily Horowitz, Oct. 24, 2013

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Experience: Practicing since 1997
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

Recent Posts

What Are the Consequences of Insurance Fraud in Minnesota?

Potential consequences of insurance fraud depend on whether the offense gets reported to the police for investigation and prosecution.

What Is the Exclusionary Rule in a Criminal Case?

So, what is the exclusionary rule, and how does it apply to your case? The exclusionary rule is a court-driven rule that takes effect when evidence in a criminal case is unlawfully obtained. In your case, a court might use the exclusionary rule if the illegally obtained evidence helped the officers get other pieces of evidence they would not have found otherwise.  The secondary evidence subject to the exclusionary rule is referred to as the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine. The exclusionary rule borrows its reasoning from constitutional rights. So, it applies to criminal cases as a deterrent and remedy rather than a standalone constitutional right.

What Happens If You Violate Probation in Minnesota?

People who suspect that they have violated probation or are already facing a violation charge might ask, “What happens if you violate probation?” A probation violation in Minneapolis, Minnesota could result in a range of consequences, depending on the type and severity of the violation. Those consequences include reprimand from probation officers, enhanced supervision and stricter conditions, and probation revocation and incarceration.