Man arrested for DWI-related charges after Stillwater nursing home accident

A Rochester man was arrested in suspicion of driving while impaired after a car accident at a Stillwater nursing home. Police claim the man stole his girlfriend’s sport utility vehicle and around 1:00 Sunday morning struck two cars in Stillwater, before running the SUV into a nursing home. The 31-year-old man may be facing serious charges, including felony motor vehicle theft, second degree DWI and criminal vehicular operation (CVO) related to the allegations. The second-degree DWI and the CVO charges the man may be facing are gross misdemeanor charges.

A spokesperson for the Stillwater nursing home says the SUV knocked out a window and a wall at the nursing home. The spokesperson says the SUV crashed into the room of two residents of the home. One of the residents reportedly suffered cuts and was treated at an area hospital and released. The second resident of the nursing home reportedly was not injured.

A sergeant with the Stillwater Police says the driver has prior DWIs on his record. Law enforcement claims the man was driving with a revoked license at the time of the accident.

In Minnesota, a felony charge is defined as any charge that carries a potential sentence of at least one-year-and-one-day. Gross misdemeanor charges expose a person to significant jail time as well. A person could be sentenced up to a year in jail for a gross misdemeanor conviction. Convictions for gross misdemeanor DWI offenses also carry mandatory minimum jail time. In additional to potential incarceration, DWI convictions have other consequences under Minnesota law.

Generally, Minnesota’s implied consent law allows for a person’s driver’s license to be revoked after a DWI arrest, even without a conviction for a Minnesota DWI charge. The license revocation can be challenged; however, an implied consent license revocation is a separate matter from the criminal DWI charges.

Source: Pioneer Press, “For smashing into nursing home, hurting one: DWI charges,” Dec. 11, 2011

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

A Santa Clara University study shows that over one million people in Minnesota have criminal records. In Minneapolis alone, 5,713 crimes are reported annually within an area of 100,000 residents. These criminal cases require the defendants to present evidence challenging the prosecutor's narrative. So, when does the defense present evidence in a criminal case? Your defense team presents evidence at the trial phase right after the prosecution team completes outlining the facts it intends to prove and how its evidence will prove you guilty.
Media attention and public scrutiny after conviction can hurt your personal and professional reputation, especially if your criminal case is high-profile. One of the questions you may ask is: How do I handle media attention and public scrutiny after conviction in Minnesota? You can do that by familiarizing yourself with your rights, having a witness present during a media interview, minimizing media consumption, and taking a break from social media. Building a strong support system and working closely with a criminal defense lawyer can help you handle or minimize the impact of public scrutiny.
The timeline for filing pre-trial motions in a criminal case in Minnesota varies with the type of motion. A motion related to the discovery of evidence or dismissal of a criminal case must be filed at least three days before the Omnibus Hearing. The prosecution is then allowed to respond to the motions, and the court sets the timeline for these responses.