New Drunk Driving Penalties for Minnesotans in 2011

Minnesota is known throughout the country as a tough state on drunk drivers; a conviction for driving while intoxicated can carry very stiff consequences in the North Star State. As of July 1, 2011, new additions to Minnesota’s DWI laws have expanded the range of sentencing options, especially for second and subsequent offenses and DUIs committed with a high alcohol content (AC).

Ignition Interlock Program Expanded

The Minnesota Ignition Interlock Device Program began as a pilot program in 2009. Now, it is a permanent addition to state law.

Under the rules that became effective July 1, certain drivers who have had their licenses revoked due to a DWI conviction will be able to bypass specified revocation periods through the installation of an ignition interlock device. Ignition interlocks will not allow a vehicle to start unless the driver passes an AC test. Drivers also must breathe into the device for a “rolling test” periodically during vehicle operation.

For first-time DUI offenders arrested with an AC of .16 or more and all second time offenders, participation in the program is an optional method of regaining driving privileges early. For offenders convicted of more serious DUI offenses whose driving privileges have been denied as “inimical to public safety,” enrollment in the program is required for three to six years in order to regain a full, unencumbered driver’s license.

While ignition interlock will allow many DWI offenders to get their driving privileges back more quickly, the expense may be prohibitive for some. Generally, the devices cost about $50 to install, and drivers must also pay a monthly monitoring fee of approximately $100. This means a first-time offender who tests .16 and is thus required to be on interlock for one year, or serve a one-year driver’s license revocation with no work permit for an entire year, would pay over $1,200 for the one year of being on ignition interlock in order to be able to legally drive and to stay employed, etc.

Other DWI Changes

In addition to setting forth the provisions of the ignition interlock program, the new legal updates lowered the high AC DWI civil (but not criminal) aggravating factor from .20 to .16 (those drivers, even first-time offenders, with a test result of .16 or higher will now face enhanced driver’s license penalties and license plate impoundment). License revocation periods for those caught with a high AC were raised, and revocation periods for repeat offenders were also drastically increased.

Contact a Minnesota DUI/DWI Defense Lawyer

Whether your DWI arrest occurred in Minneapolis, St. Paul or anywhere else in Minnesota, it is important to get in touch with an experienced, aggressive criminal defense attorney as soon as possible to protect your legal rights. Contact a criminal defense attorney today to help keep you out of jail and to protect your ongoing freedom to drive.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.