Theft By Swindle Charges For Woman Who Embezzled 1.3 Million Dollars

Stephanie Langten Castillo was charged with eight counts of theft by swindle in Hennepin County. Theft by swindle is a felony in Minnesota. Castillo stole approximately 1.3 million dollars from four companies when she was employed at her mother’s company called Balderson Management. Castillo was in charge of operating and leasing commercial properties. She also had access to clients’ funds. She crated fake invoices to different vendors and wrote fraudulent checks. Castillo forged her mother’s signature on the checks. She also used clients’ money to pay her own personal bills and to help with her husband’s business. Castillo admitted to the theft and stated that she needed money for her sick dog.

The sentencing guidelines for felony theft by swindle are between 90 and 68 months in prison. However, the Hennepin County attorney’s office is seeking a departure from the guidelines. The court can depart from the guidelines when there are identifiable, substantial, and compelling circumstances to support a departure. Factors such as race sex, employment, education, and living arrangements cannot be taken account when the court is deciding whether to grant a departure. Some mitigating factors include whether the victim was an aggressor in the incident, whether the offender played a minor or passive role in the incident, and whether the offender lacked substantial capacity for judgment when the offense was committed due to a physical or mental impairment.

Castillo will need to argue that mitigating factors were involved, especially if the County Attorney is looking for a sentence beyond the sentencing guidelines. Keller Criminal Defense Attorneys offers free consultations for individuals charged with a crime. Max Keller is an experienced Hennepin County defense lawyer. If you have been charged with theft by swindle or another crime, call 952-913-1421. A Hennepin county defense lawyer will be able to fight the charges against you.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

A Santa Clara University study shows that over one million people in Minnesota have criminal records. In Minneapolis alone, 5,713 crimes are reported annually within an area of 100,000 residents. These criminal cases require the defendants to present evidence challenging the prosecutor's narrative. So, when does the defense present evidence in a criminal case? Your defense team presents evidence at the trial phase right after the prosecution team completes outlining the facts it intends to prove and how its evidence will prove you guilty.
Media attention and public scrutiny after conviction can hurt your personal and professional reputation, especially if your criminal case is high-profile. One of the questions you may ask is: How do I handle media attention and public scrutiny after conviction in Minnesota? You can do that by familiarizing yourself with your rights, having a witness present during a media interview, minimizing media consumption, and taking a break from social media. Building a strong support system and working closely with a criminal defense lawyer can help you handle or minimize the impact of public scrutiny.
The timeline for filing pre-trial motions in a criminal case in Minnesota varies with the type of motion. A motion related to the discovery of evidence or dismissal of a criminal case must be filed at least three days before the Omnibus Hearing. The prosecution is then allowed to respond to the motions, and the court sets the timeline for these responses.