US Supreme Court issues decision in case involving drug-sniffing dogs

Protecting the right of people to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures is at the heart of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Minnesota mirrors the protections of the Fourth Amendment in article I, section 10 of the state constitution. State and federal courts frequently must decide if evidence seized by law enforcement officers and used to prove criminal charges violates the Minnesota and federal constitutional protections.

In some of these cases, a police dog trained to detect the scent of drugs is used to establish grounds for the search. While a dog’s sense of smell may provide grounds for a search of a motor vehicle, the U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled that using drug-sniffing dogs to pick up the scent of drugs inside a home violated the Fourth Amendment.

Do drug-sniffing dogs constitute an unreasonable search?

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that a dog trained to detect the scent of drugs is a reliable source to establish probable cause to search a motor vehicle stopped for a traffic violation or at a DUI roadblock. The Minnesota Supreme Court extended the use of dogs to searches of a person’s home or apartment in 2007.

The Minnesota court ruled that a police dog’s signal could be sufficient support for a request for a search warrant to enter and search an apartment. The court held that such use of a drug-sniffing dog did not violate the apartment owner’s Fourth Amendment right to privacy.

This decision appears to be at odds with the most recent decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, in which it held that police use of a drug-sniffing dog to detect the scent of marijuana from outside a person’s home was an unconstitutional intrusion.

The case before the U.S. Supreme Court involved an individual who was growing marijuana in his private residence. A drug-sniffing dog alerted to the presence of marijuana, which police used as justification to obtain a warrant to search the house. Citing Fourth Amendment prohibitions on unreasonable searches, the high court ruled against the use of drug-sniffing dogs to establish probable cause to enter a home.

Protect your rights

A person accused of committing a crime in which police gathered evidence by a search and seizure should retain the services of a criminal defense attorney. The protections offered by the U.S. and Minnesota constitutions can only help if the accused person challenges the procedures used by the police.

He has won jury trial cases in misdemeanor and felony cases and in DWI’s and non-DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. He is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Minnesota’s new marijuana law legalizes marijuana for recreational purposes for adults 21 years or older. The new law makes it unlawful for employers to take action against their employees for off-duty cannabis use. It also prohibits them from refusing to hire an applicant who tests positive for cannabis or requiring applicants to take pre-employment cannabis testing.
Is weed legal in Minnesota? Currently, weed is legal for medical and recreational use in the state. A new Minnesota law legalized weed for recreational use on August 1, 2023. Persons aged 21-years or older may possess or carry a maximum of two ounces of marijuana flower in public.
People arrested or accused of possessing cocaine might ask, “how much coke is a felony?” Possessing controlled substances like cocaine is a felony in Minneapolis, MN. If found with 0 to 3 grams of coke, the crime will be treated as a fifth-degree felony, attracting penalties like $10,000 fines and up to 5 years in jail.