Veteran Minnesota legislator fights binge drinking in unique way

No one can deny that underage binge drinking is a serious problem in the U.S. The Midwest is especially known for underage drinking on college campuses and among high school students.

Minnesota state Rep. Phyllis Kahn, D-Minneapolis, is proposing a bill that she thinks may help with this problem. Under the law, those 18 and older could drink alcohol at bars and restaurants, and those 16 and 17 could do so if their parents were there with them to purchase it.

A valid concern being raised is how such a change in the social drinking norm would affect the rate of drunk driving for those new young drinkers.

In neighboring Wisconsin, parents can buy liquor for their minor kids when they are together in bars. This is reportedly one inspiration for the idea behind Rep. Kahn’s proposal. She thinks that if teens learned to drink alcohol responsibly around adults in a controlled environment, it might lessen the likelihood of binge drinking.

The bill would still not allow anyone under 21 to purchase alcohol at a liquor store, however. The emphasis would be on allowing social drinking in public only.

Similar sentiment is expressed in the theory that Europeans have less binge drinking. They learn to drink responsibly with their families from a young age, so to young adults there, alcohol is not a mysterious, unattainable substance to be guzzled whenever possible.

Source: KAAL-TV, “Lawmaker Proposes New MN Drinking Law, 16-year-olds Allowed,” Ellery McCardle, Feb. 2, 2012

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.